On Friday, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) raised concerns about the impartiality of the caretaker government as Pakistan approaches the crucial general elections scheduled for February next year.
Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb from the IHC criticized the interim government, denouncing it for running a “terrible system” in the country.
Under the caretaker setup, the judge noted, “A terrible state of affairs is prevailing, where even consultation for elections is not allowed,” casting doubt on the government’s intentions for the upcoming polls slated for February 8.
The judge questioned, “Does the caretaker government want to derail the elections?” This inquiry arose during the hearing of a plea filed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Barrister Gauhar Khan and other lawyers. They sought permission to meet the party’s founder, Imran Khan, who is currently in jail.
The legal team argued that they wanted to consult with Khan regarding the decision to distribute 700 party tickets as the polls approach.
Taking note of the plea, the judge granted permission for the legal team to meet Khan for consultations ahead of the polls next year, subsequently dismissing the petition.
In its order, the court emphasized that the PTI founder should be allowed to meet the party’s chairman under the supervision of Adiala jail superintendent.
“Allowing consultation for elections is a fundamental right,” the court stated, underscoring the party’s right to consult its founder on ticket distribution.
The judge also urged the caretaker government to maintain neutrality in the elections, emphasizing that opposition to the PTI founder’s consultation raises questions about the government’s impartiality.
During the plea hearing, the additional attorney general and Adiala jail superintendent also appeared in court. Both officials faced objections from the attorney general and advocate general, drawing the court’s criticism.
“Was the additional note from the Supreme Court not enough for you? After the Supreme Court, do you want me to write a note against you?” Justice Aurangzeb asked, admonishing both government representatives. The judge emphasized that the attorney general and advocate general’s office should represent the caretaker government impartially.
