On Monday, the Supreme Court of Pakistan disposed of the appeals filed by the Punjab government, which sought the cancellation of bail for individuals accused in the May 9 incidents. The Court directed that the trials of all accused be concluded within the next four months, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal timelines and ensuring a fair trial process.
During the proceedings, the case of Khadija Shah was raised. Her lawyer, Sameer Khosa, highlighted concerns about multiple cases registered against her despite a similar order being passed in one of them. Chief Justice Yahya Afridi reassured the court that all accused, including Shah, would have their legal rights protected and that this would be explicitly stated in the court order.
The Chief Justice also addressed concerns raised by Shah’s lawyer regarding the lack of a copy of the indictment despite numerous witness statements. He underscored the necessity of trial courts’ independence and confirmed that all required documents, including the indictment, would be provided to the accused promptly.
Regarding PTI leader Tayyaba Raja, involved in the May 9 attacks on Jinnah House, the court ruled that her trial would be completed within the four-month deadline as well. Raja clarified that her involvement was only tied to the Jinnah House attack, and the Court disposed of the appeal for bail cancellation.
In a significant development, the Supreme Court issued a notice to PTI leader Umar Sarfraz Cheema, who was involved in the May 9 incidents and allegedly held weapons. The court directed that any investigation issues be promptly resolved as Cheema remained in custody.
Former PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry also appeared before the court, expressing frustration that his case had not been scheduled for hearing. Chief Justice Afridi assured Chaudhry that his case would be taken up the following day and addressed concerns over Anti-Terrorism Courts being converted into military courts.
The Supreme Court emphasized the urgency of resolving the May 9 cases expeditiously and impartially, reinforcing the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring fair trials for all accused.
